Bryan Johnson’s Blueprint Protocol

BJ
Maximalist Protocol

Bryan Johnson’s Longevity Protocol

100+ daily pills, $2M/year protocol โ€” the most aggressive longevity experiment
๐Ÿงช 31 supplements tracked
๐Ÿ’ฐ ~$2,000+/mo
๐Ÿ“… Updated March 2026

About Bryan Johnson
โš•๏ธ Not medical advice. This page documents publicly shared information from podcasts, interviews, and published content. Consult your healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen.
31
Supplements

$2,000+
Est. Monthly Cost

Maximalist
Approach

Evidence Rating Key

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… Multiple RCTs + meta-analyses in humans
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… At least one RCT in humans
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… Human observational or mechanistic data
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… Animal studies or preliminary human data
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… Theoretical / anecdotal only

๐Ÿ” The Core Question: Do the Supplements Actually Matter?

Johnson’s protocol combines three categories of intervention: sleep (8:30 pm bedtime, 8 hours minimum), exercise (1 hour/day structured training), and 100+ supplements. The critical โ€” and mostly unasked โ€” question is: how much of his documented improvement comes from each?

The scientific literature is fairly clear on this hierarchy. Sleep and exercise are the two most powerful known interventions for biological age markers. Regular vigorous exercise alone reduces all-cause mortality risk by 26โ€“31% per Johnson’s own cited research. Consistent sleep reduces every major disease risk category. These effects are massive, dose-responsive, and free.

Johnson’s supplement stack โ€” even the most evidence-backed portions โ€” produce effects measured in percentage points or single biomarker improvements. The fundamental confound: as a single case study simultaneously implementing 100+ interventions, there is no way to isolate supplement contribution. Many experts (including clinicians at ACSH) note this limitation explicitly.1

100+
Personal stack compounds

~20
Commercial Blueprint essentials

$2M
Estimated annual spend

47
Age (claims bio age ~35)

๐Ÿ“… Protocol Evolution: Then vs Now

Blueprint has changed significantly since 2021. Some changes reflect evidence-based pruning; others coincide with the launch of commercial Blueprint products โ€” a distinction worth noting.

Intervention 2021โ€“2023 Status 2024โ€“2026 Status Reason for Change
Young plasma transfusions Active โ€” receiving son’s plasma โŒ Discontinued No measurable effect on biomarkers; team data analysis concluded no benefit
Growth Hormone (GH) Active (100-day trial) โŒ Discontinued Side effects: elevated intracranial pressure, headaches, blood glucose spike2
Rapamycin Active (weekly) โŒ Discontinued 2024 Side effects; concluded it “may have done more harm than good”3
Cerebrolysin (injections) Active (3-month trial) โŒ Discontinued No measurable cognitive biomarker effect found
Metformin Active (longevity use) โš ๏ธ Reduced / personal Concerns about blunting exercise adaptations (mitochondrial signalling)
Acarbose (Rx) Active โœ… Still active (200 mg/day) Continued โ€” post-meal glucose blunting, ITP animal data
NMN / NR (NAD+) Active โœ… Active โ€” alternating NMN/NR 6x/week Cornerstone โ€” also sold in Blueprint commercial stack
HBOT (hyperbaric Oโ‚‚) Not in protocol โœ… Added Nov 2024 โ€” 60 sessions at 2 ATA Telomere extension results, inflammation elimination (hsCRP undetectable)
Gene Therapy (Follistatin) Not in protocol โœ… Added Oct 2023 โ€” ongoing 160% follistatin increase reported; muscle preservation / myostatin inhibition

๐Ÿ’ฐ The Commercial Blueprint: Protocol or Product?

Starting in 2023, Johnson launched Blueprint-branded supplements (Essential Capsules, Longevity Mix, Protein powder, Olive Oil, etc.). This creates an important distinction that many followers miss:

  • Johnson’s personal stack: 100+ compounds including Rx drugs (Acarbose, Tadalafil), gene therapy, HBOT, plasmalogens โ€” supervised by 30 doctors, costs millions
  • Commercial Blueprint products: Simplified OTC versions (NMN, Vitamin C, Niacinamide, Omega-3, polyphenols) โ€” priced accessibly, sold to the public
  • The gap: The compounds Johnson actually attributes his results to (Acarbose, HBOT, gene therapy) are not available in his commercial products by definition
  • The incentive: Johnson’s public emphasis has increasingly shifted toward supplements included in his commercial stack โ€” a conflict of interest worth weighing when evaluating his recommendations

This is not unique to Johnson โ€” most longevity influencers who sell supplements face the same tension. Blueprint markets its products at “near not-for-profit pricing”, though independent verification of this claim is not available.

Evidence Ratings

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… Strong RCT/meta-analysis
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜† Good evidence
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜† Moderate/mixed
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜† Weak/anecdotal
โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†โ˜† Experimental only

๐Ÿ’Š Current Core Supplements (2025โ€“2026)

Supplement Dose Purpose Evidence In Blueprint Product?
NMN / NR (alternating) 500โ€“1,000 mg/day, 6x/week NAD+ restoration; mitochondrial energy โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜† โœ… Yes
Vitamin D3 + K2 2,000โ€“4,000 IU D3 / 180 mcg K2-MK7 Immune, bone, cardiovascular; both K forms (MK-4 + MK-7) โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… โœ… Yes
Omega-3 (DHA/EPA) 1,000โ€“2,000 mg/day Cardiovascular, inflammation, brain โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… โœ… Yes (Blueprint DHA/EPA)
Vitamin C 500 mg/day Antioxidant; collagen synthesis; immune โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… โœ… Yes
Niacinamide (B3) 300 mg/day NAD+ support; DNA repair; skin health โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜† โœ… Yes
Spermidine 1 mg/day (wheat germ or supplement) Autophagy induction; anti-senescence โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜† โœ… Yes
Calcium AKG (Ca-AKG) 1,000 mg/day Krebs cycle; epigenetic clock; lifespan in animal studies โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜† โœ… Yes
Lycopene 10 mg/day Prostate protection; cardiovascular antioxidant โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜† Partial
Ashwagandha 600 mg/day (KSM-66) Cortisol regulation; sleep quality; stress resilience โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜† Partial
CoQ10 (Ubiquinol) 100 mg/day Mitochondrial electron transport chain โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜† Partial

๐Ÿ”ฌ Prescription & Experimental (Not in Commercial Products)

Intervention Type Purpose Evidence
Acarbose Rx drug Post-meal glucose blunting; ITP longevity data (animal) โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Tadalafil Rx drug Endothelial function; cardiovascular; inflammation4 โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
HBOT (60 sessions) Experimental Telomere extension; senolytic; inflammation reset โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
Gene Therapy (Follistatin) Experimental Myostatin inhibition; muscle mass; anti-aging (animal data) โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
Plasmalogens (Glia/Neuro) Experimental Brain/heart phospholipids; antioxidant; cognitive longevity โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
MSC Stem Cells (300M) Experimental Joint regeneration; injected knees/hips/shoulders Mar 2024 โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†

๐Ÿ“Š Results: Johnson vs Peers vs US Averages

Johnson publishes biomarker data publicly. Below we compare his reported markers against available data from other longevity influencers and US reference ranges โ€” adding context rather than just presenting his claims.

Marker Johnson (2025) US Average (47yo male) Attia (similar age) Notes
hsCRP (inflammation) <0.1 mg/L (undetectable) ~1.5โ€“2.5 mg/L Typically <0.5 mg/L Post-HBOT. Previously ~0.3โ€“0.5. HBOT likely major contributor.
Biological age (epigenetic) ~35โ€“38 (claimed) ~47 (matches chrono) Not published Claims 5+ yr reversal. Epigenetic clocks have ยฑ2โ€“3yr error. Methodology varies by clock used.5
Telomere length 10.3โ†’11.4 kb (post-HBOT) ~7โ€“8 kb (47yo) Not published Baseline already “10-year-old equivalent.” 2.6% extension notable โ€” or ceiling effect. Single measurement.
VOโ‚‚ max ~67 mL/kg/min ~35โ€“38 (average 47yo) ~60+ (elite athlete range) This is almost certainly exercise-driven. Matches elite cyclist/runner performance.
Skin age reversal โ€“9 years (claimed) N/A N/A Measured via Canfield Visia multispectral imaging. UV protection + Blueprint skincare products + red light โ€” not supplements alone.
Intracellular NAD+ 54.6 ฮผM (optimal range) ~20โ€“40 ฮผM (declines with age) Not published Tested via Jinfiniti assay. NMN/NR supplementation likely contributor. Exercise also raises NAD+.
Context note: Johnson’s VOโ‚‚ max (~67) is his most extraordinary marker โ€” and also the one most directly attributable to his structured daily exercise. A 47-year-old training 1 hour daily with periodized intensity would be expected to achieve similar VOโ‚‚ max values independent of any supplement. His inflammation and epigenetic markers, while impressive, overlap with what is achievable through elite sleep + exercise alone โ€” making supplement attribution speculative.

๐ŸŒ™ Lifestyle: The Underrated Core

Johnson’s lifestyle protocols are likely his highest-leverage interventions. They are free, evidence-based, and poorly promoted compared to his supplement stack โ€” possibly because they cannot be commercialised.

Sleep โ€” 8:30 pm bedtime, 8+ hours
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

Rigid consistency: same bedtime nightly, no screens 60 min before. Johnson calls this “the most heroic act in 2025.” The evidence agrees: consistent sleep timing is at least as important as duration for cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes.6

Exercise โ€” 1 hour/day, structured
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

Mix of Zone 2 cardio and resistance training. His own cited literature: regular exercise reduces all-cause mortality by 26โ€“31% and cardiovascular disease by 28โ€“38%.7 His VOโ‚‚ max of ~67 is the single most striking biomarker in his data โ€” and the most exercise-attributable.

Diet โ€” 1,977 kcal, plant-heavy, no alcohol
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

All food consumed within a 6โ€“8 hour window. 100g protein minimum. Minimal processing, high fibre (โ‰ฅ30g/day). Zero alcohol. This dietary pattern alone has decades of strong outcome data in longevity literature.

Footnotes

  1. American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), 2025: “Case studies represent the lowest level of scientific evidence. There is no way to guarantee which specific interventions produced Johnson’s results.”
  2. Growth hormone discontinued after 100-day trial. Side effects: elevated intracranial pressure, headaches, blood glucose spike. Source: protocol.bryanjohnson.com
  3. Rapamycin: Johnson’s 2024 statement โ€” decided it “may have done more harm than good.” Contrast with Attia and Sinclair who still advocate for rapamycin. See Attia protocol page.
  4. Tadalafil (2.5 mg daily) โ€” endothelial function use, not traditional indication. Off-label longevity use increasingly studied; not FDA-approved for this indication.
  5. Epigenetic clocks (Horvath, DunedinPace, GrimAge) have measurement error of ยฑ2โ€“3 years. “Biological age reversal” claims depend heavily on which clock is used and baseline variation.
  6. Walker MP. “Why We Sleep.” 2017. Sleep consistency evidence: Chellappa et al., PNAS, 2021.
  7. Ortega FB et al. BMJ, 2012. ~1.1M Swedish adolescent males: weakest tertile muscular strength โ†’ 20โ€“35% higher premature death risk vs strongest tertile.

Changelog
  • Mar 2026 โ€” Page created. Sources: protocol.bryanjohnson.com, blueprint.bryanjohnson.com, ACSH review (Feb 2025), yourdailyway.com, omre.co, jinfiniti.com.

Sources

5. ITP (Interventions Testing Program) โ€” acarbose longevity data in mice: Strong R et al., Aging Cell, 2016.
6. Ortega FB et al. “Muscular strength in male adolescents and premature death.” BMJ, 2012.
7. Chellappa SL et al. “Daytime variation in performance, subjective sleepiness and mood.” PNAS, 2021.

Compare Other Protocols

Key contrast: Attia is the most conservative (no NMN, skeptical of most longevity supplements). Sinclair is aggressive on NAD+/resveratrol. Johnson overlaps with Sinclair on NAD+ and goes furthest on experimental interventions. All three discontinued rapamycin or are cautious about it โ€” Johnson most visibly.

๐Ÿ“‹ Protocol Change Log

March 2026 โ€” Protocol page updated with latest publicly shared information.