About Our Research Process

Our Commitment to Evidence-Based Content

Every article on Longevity Notes is grounded in peer-reviewed scientific research and careful analysis of expert protocols. We believe that longevity information should be accurate, up-to-date, and accessible to everyone.

How We Source Our Research

Our content draws exclusively from peer-reviewed articles published in leading scientific journals and professional medical databases, complemented by careful review of protocols recommended by leading longevity researchers and clinicians.

Our Editorial Process

  • Research Identification — We systematically track peer-reviewed publications across longevity science, geroscience, and the protocols recommended by leading longevity experts including Peter Attia, David Sinclair, Andrew Huberman, and Matt Kaeberlein.
  • Relevance Filtering — Studies are evaluated for methodology quality, sample size, and potential impact before coverage.
  • Content Preparation — Research findings are synthesized into accessible, reader-friendly articles that maintain scientific accuracy.
  • Quality Review — Every article is reviewed for accuracy, relevance, and readability before publication.
  • Source Attribution — Original research papers are cited and linked so readers can verify and access primary sources.

What We Are Not

We are not a medical practice, and our content does not constitute medical advice. We are a research communication platform that makes scientific findings accessible. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals for personal medical decisions.

Transparency

Some articles may contain affiliate links to products mentioned in research. These partnerships help support our mission of making research accessible, but they never influence our editorial process or the studies we cover.